Today, India's Supreme Court delivered a highly-anticipated verdict on the legalisation of same-sex marriage. The panel overseeing the verdict, led by Justice DY Chandrachud, said that individuals belonging to the LGBTQ+ community have "no fundamental right to marry" and that they do not hold the power to "pass a law."
The SC left it to the Indian Parliament to decide on necessary amendments to the 1954 Special Marriages Act to accommodate non-heterosexual marriages in India.
This decision follows the historic 2018 Supreme Court ruling that abolished a colonial-era ban on homosexual activities.
LGBTQ activists hope for positive verdict from SC in same sex marriage case
— ANI Digital (@ani_digital) October 17, 2023
Read @ANI Story |https://t.co/mi1XABcX7t#LGBTQ #SupremeCourt #samesexmarriage pic.twitter.com/RjqqKWrShr
The petitioners argued that LGBT couples in India should be granted the same rights as heterosexual couples, including recognition as 'spouses' in financial, insurance, medical, inheritance, succession, adoption, and surrogacy matters.
#WATCH | Bengaluru: One of the petitioners of LGBTQI marriage, Akkai Padmashali says, "...The resistance from the heterosexual people, not all, but almost everyone was objecting to marriages of LGBTQI…today the whole country is set to hear the judgement...people’s eyes are on… pic.twitter.com/cAj9E9W8SM
— ANI (@ANI) October 17, 2023
Three decades ago, India, which now acknowledges same-sex relationships, once severely persecuted openly gay individuals. Revealing one's sexual orientation back then could endanger one's employment or even life in Indian society.
On September 6, 2018, a unanimous decision by a five-judge bench led to the removal of Section 377 from the Indian Penal Code (IPC), thereby legalizing consensual same-sex relationships.
Section 377 of the IPC represented India's initial legislation on homosexuality. This law, in effect from 1861 to 2018, stipulated that being queer in India was punishable by up to 10 years in jail for engaging in “carnal intercourse against the order of nature."