India's financial news is turning out to be quite a shocker because officials have recently found in 2022, that some deeds of 2016 are apparently not as prudent as they should have been. While an ex-CEO and MD of the country's National Stock Exchange followed the guidance of an unknown spiritual guru (who is physically absent but can reply to mails) to take big business decisions, while casually breaching laws and regulations in the name of spirituality, here is everything we know so far about this weird story in 10 points:
1. THE SO-CALLED GURU/HERO – THE UNKNOWN HIMALAYAN MAHARATHI
2. WHO IS CHITRA RAMKRISHNA?
Chitra Ramkrishna was on the board of directors of the National Stock Exchange, India's premier stock exchange, from April 2013 to December 2016. She is a Chartered Accountant from India and also holds a degree from the Chartered Institute of Management Accountants, UK. Chitra was the third woman to head an exchange in the Asia-Pacific region after Sri Lanka’s Colombo Stock Exchange and China’s Shenzhen Stock Exchange.
Chitra was appointed joint Managing Director of NSE in 2009 and promoted to CEO in 2013. She was finally made to leave her job but her on-record reason for quitting the post remains 'personal reasons'.
4. THE CURIOUS CASE OF AN UNKNOWN APPOINTMENT
In 2013, Chitra appointed a person called Anand Subramanian, as a ‘Chief Strategy Advisor’. He was apparently personally interviewed by Chitra and the salary that was payable to him was agreed to be Rs 1.68 crore. Over a period of 3 years, his salary and power grew exponentially to Rs 4.21 crore, though his working days increased only from a mere 4-day working week to a 5-day working week, of which he was only required to be in office for 3 out of 5 days.
However, the problem with this was that in a company like NSE, where the total value of the companies traded on NSE is almost 1.5 times India’s GDP, there were no HR records of this particular appointment. There were no records of his on-boarding process, interview rounds, no advertisements for his role, no records of others having applied for this role, or others being interviewed or rejected.
Second, his previous salary was around Rs 15 lakh, when he was a vice-president in a small company called Transafe Services, that is in the leasing and repair industry, and was a previous subsidiary of Balmer Laurie & Co, a government company. When a person changes fields and comes into a new one without basic knowledge or experience, a salary hike by 9 times is rare, if it is even present.
Also, whistleblowers complained to SEBI about this particular appointment not being declared as a Key Managerial Personnel (KMP). Meaning, every high level appointment like that of a CEO, CFO, MD, etc., is classified as a KMP appointment and requires even more disclosures than that of normal employees. The documentation is stricter and is usually checked by audit teams very closely.
But Chitra apparently did not document any of this process and hired him as a consultant, which she said was not like an employee. She even paid him more, like a privileged individual, and gave him perks like travelling to Chennai every week, by either first class or business class.
5. BUT, HOW DID THEY COME ACROSS THIS?
You might remember that scene from the movie Guru, where traders shout out the cost of a particular item to trade it in the stock exchange and there are a hundred traders shouting the price on the top of their voice. Now, this system is outdated and all the trading happens electronically; but the thing is, when you trade electronically, you cannot know the expected final price of an item. Which is why, if you get to know the expected price of a stock earlier than others, you will benefit from it as you can make easy profits.
Between 2015-16, SEBI and the government received a series of anonymous whistleblower letters which talked about the corporate governance lapses at NSE. While some talked about a few brokers receiving preferential access to NSE servers through a co-location facility, others spoke of in Between 2015 and 2016, Sebi and the government received a series of anonymous whistleblower letters. It is not clear if all the letters came from a single whistleblower. All the letters broadly made allegations over corporate governance lapses at NSE, but the specifics of each were different. For instance, a whistleblower letter in January 2015 talked about a few brokers who received preferential access to NSE servers through a co-location facility. Similarly, the market regulator received two whistleblower. the elevation of Anand Subramanian.
6. THE CO-LOCATION ISSUE
The first whistleblowers found that many brokers' computers were linked to NSE’s systems and since they were linked, they were getting information just a few seconds earlier than others, which got the algorithmic traders more profits. This phenomenon was called the ‘co-location’ issue, which showed that NSE’s systems were compromised, which led to management changes in the NSE. But all of this happened during the reign of Chitra and her team, which eventually caused her to leave due to 'personal reasons'.
7. WHAT DID THE SEBI FIND?
When SEBI conducted an investigation into the co-location issue, it also came across documentary evidence which showed that Chitra (Noticee 1) had shared certain confidential NSE information with an unknown person during 2014 to 2016. The NSE management then found the mails between Chitra and the so-called wise man. The controversy first erupted in 2015-16, but when Chitra and Anand both quit in 2016, the matter died down.
CBI too got fresh evidence and on the orders of the court, the CBI filed an FIR in a co-location case in 2018. The CBI case was against a stockbroker who had allegedly manipulated NSE's system with help from then-top officials to get access before anyone else to markets when they opened. The CBI named Sanjay Gupta (promoter of OPG Security Pvt Ltd), Aman Kokrady, his brother-in-law, and data cruncher and researcher Ajay Shah as accused in the case, along with unknown officials of the NSE and SEBI.
In 2019, SEBI asked NSE to disgorge Rs 624.89 crore and barred it from accessing the market for funds for 6 months. Ramkrishna and Anand both had to also give away 25% of their salaries during a certain period.
8. THE JUICY MAILS
Earlier, the SEBI was only concerned with the co-location issue, which was serious in itself. But SEBI is now acting on the breach of confidentiality which was done between Chitra and her faceless yogi. The issue resurfaced after the latest SEBI order, which revealed some highly unusual details of the last few years of her tenure at the NSE.
SEBI's probe on this issue listed a final 190-page report on its website against Chitra and her jhol team and has disclosed that:
9. WHAT'S HAPPENING AS OF TODAY?
The consequences of this mess have just begun and for starters,
Further, Ramkrishna and Subramanian have been restrained from associating with any market infrastructure institution or any intermediary registered with SEBI for 3 years, while the same for Narain is 2 years.
The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has questioned both Chitra and another former chief of the NSE, Ravi Narain, in relation to the colocation issue and have issued a lookout notice against Chitra Ramakrishna, Anand Subramanian, and Ravi Narain.
The Income Tax department has raided the Mumbai residences of both Chitra and Anand to check charges of tax evasion and financial irregularities against her and others.
While some are convinced that the conman is none other than Anand Subramanian, others believe as per some reports, that the baba has nothing to do with the Himalayas and is a former bureaucrat from the Union Finance Ministry who was in charge of the capital markets and shaped Chitra’s career to help her reach the top at NSE.
10. WHY IS THIS SUCH A BIG BLUNDER FOR INDIA ?
This is a classic case of Management Override of Control, where the management helps the company in conducting frauds by intentionally hiding their activities and bypassing stringent regulatory requirements. The case reeks of violations of trust, laws and regulations and also will lead to unknown financial consequences for all involved. It also proves to be blatantly breaching 'Confidential Clauses' and questions the basis by which the public trusts entities like these.
It reminds us of the scams that came through those purana, unregulated government departments which are left unchecked due to lack of accountability and responsibility.
This might also affect the stakeholders, especially the auditors, who are meant to keep an eye on frauds like these.